It is clear that those who have already decided whom they will vote for the president will use all the means in their
disposal to counteract any negative arguments against their candidate. I have seen people who are for Senator Aquino, for
Speaker Villar, for Gordon, for Erap, et cetera. They will champion the cause of their candidates and would sweep under
the rug any arguments against them and/or would deny anything wrong with their candidate's record and even fight
for them even if the arguments against them are valid or factual.
So a media person who is speaking his/her opinion will be met with cynicism, skepticism
and even a presumption that s/he is biased if her opinion is against a candidate that a segment of the population is supporting
even if such person can present facts to support his/her arguments and narration of events. Many then get blinded by their
uncompromising and unswerving support of a candidate that they will want to see no evil and hear no evil of their presidential
candidate. We even criticize a a voter critic who is not voting for our candidate and making critical remarks against
our candidate as related to someone who was into graft and corruption to nullify whatever argument the critic has against
our candidate. We call this argument in Latin as Argumentum
Ad Hominem.
I see that too in the USA but the big difference is that the
voters for the most part are more responsible and more into fair play. People who did not want President Obama to be president
have now changed their opinion. Asians who did not like him now compliment him for hiring two outstanding Asians to be cabinet
secretaries have now become believers. One of the outstanding Asian in the cabinet is a Nobel Laureate. I heard this
person talked during a radio program interview and his decorum and ability to answer questions were superb. He is better than
a politician. He knows how to talk without hurting or slighting people and he is not and was never a politician. His life
is purely academic and his management experience came from being a dean of a renowned university in California. When he was interviewed for the job of Secretary, members of congress were terribly
impressed.
On the other hand, we have one member in our e-mail communication who believes that Philippine
politicians are all crooked and by definition see no redemption in the future of our country. Yet he believes that our future
offspring can change the image and life for the better. However, he can't show us how the offspring will be able to do it.
Who will mentor them to redeem our country, what institutions will play a role in making them our savior, and what organizations
will play a role in the redemption of the RP. As I said children behave according to their experience handed down by their
parents, the relatives, schools, companions and other external forces. If all these factors are not contributing to their
moral and excellent upbringing they can't do anything to redeem our life and country.
My only wish is that after our presidential election, let us rally to, support the elected
president and set aside our differences. Of course we have to watch our president so s/he does not become a carbon copy
of past presidents that we have virulently criticized.
________________________________________
Eddie Calderon of Class 1956 is a civil
Rights Officer in the State of Minnesota,
USA. He is married to his "Mutya" of the
Kyrgystan (pronounced Kerˇgezˇstán), a republic
in Central Asia)
________________________________________
********************************************************************************************